163C. The Labor Matrix: Nothing is as it Seems
The economy you have access to is sterile and simplistic. Numbers go up or down. But the real economy is quite complex and is necessarily shrouded in mystery because the reality would cause panic.
Economics is one of the hardest majors to get into and complete at a University. As I found out first hand, who gets to promote to graduate work has little to do with merit, and a lot to do with politics. By the end of this paper, you will understand why these gates are essential to keep the whole cartel functioning. 90% of economics graduates will never get a job doing economics. The education doesn’t really prepare you for the immense responsibilities involved.
Even if you are in the top 10% of graduates, that’s not enough. To understand even a small slice of the larger economy, you have to understand that slice well enough to see the unseen. This means you need to understand it to the level of a Domain or Subject Matter Expert (SME). This allows you to know what to look for, what to ignore, and how to connect the dots to make effective decisions that the people with all the money need to keep/increase their money. For all these reasons, I don’t think economics should be a first degree. I went back to school to study economics at the age of 41 after already becoming an SME in interactive media. This worked out really well and makes me very effective at predicting events in or adjacent to interactive media.
In the first paper in this series I explained the rules that govern Labor in the West (and pretty much the world now) and where those rules came from. It’s hard to teach my readers about Labor without first explaining what it is, thus the purpose of that paper. That isn’t me teaching economics. A graduate from a top economics school in the top 10% won’t understand Labor at the level I describe in that paper, because students are intentionally not taught that information.
In the second paper, I expose the illusions woven by the government and academia to obfuscate (hide) what is really going on with employment and unemployment. Governments (ALL governments, this isn’t a partisan issue) will go to great lengths to make sure Labor doesn’t know the real situation they live in. If they did, those Freemen might be free to cause mischief. Obedient Labor is efficient Labor.
Now in this paper I have the unenviable job of explaining that even that truth that I exposed in the second paper hides much deeper truths, that are so objectionable that revolt would be inevitable if they became public. I trust that I am so effectively siloed from the public at this point that the risk of this information “getting out” is pretty low. My days of 1M daily readers are well behind me and I appreciate the reduction in drama.
In this paper the contents will be roughly broken down into 3 categories, but don’t hold me to that since I’m going to meander a bit:
What the REAL Labor Participation Rate looks like,
What it’s going to look like in 5 years,
I’m going to predict a massive rise in workplace violence towards women. Really.
I proceed with a heavy heart.
Why the Labor Participation Rates are Faked
In the last paper I showed you this graph, and mentioned that the Birth Control Pill was introduced in 1960:
In addition to the Pill, in 1963 the USA passed the Equal Pay Act of 1963. This made it illegal to pay women less for the same work. In 1964 opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act introduced an amendment protecting women from hiring discrimination. They were sure this had 0% chance of passing and would kill the entire Civil Rights Act. But it did, and Society Changed.
That change can be seen very clearly by that red line that just kept going UP. At least until 2000 when something amazing happened. I’m having a hard time holding back my excitement here, but please notice that the entire time that Red line was going up, the Blue line was going down. But unlike the Red line, it just kept going down. So, if you believe this graph (and you 100% should not believe this graph!) men were losing their jobs, permanently, and being replaced by women continually over 70+% years. Sadly, that’s almost entirely true. Not sad for women maybe, unless they were hoping to not be the main breadwinners in their families. Oh, that was a joke. We don’t have families anymore. We still have children occasionally, and a few die-hards still get married, but that doesn’t last long.
Want to know why so many politicians blame immigrants for “taking American jobs!”? Because no one wants to blame American women for taking American men’s jobs. That’s just not politically correct anywhere, any time. Notice how it’s always men complaining about immigrants taking their jobs? Even on South Park. One of the West’s most brilliant con jobs. Labor participation for men in 1950 was 87%! That’s just an incomprehensible number to me. If it’s at 68% now, and 5% is 9 million jobs (I did the math in previous paper), then 87% today would be (87/68= 1.28 = 28% increase, 28/5*9= 50.4. Since it’s just men, we cut that in half) 25.2 million more men employed today.
Did you hear the news this week about historically bad labor data? (Excluding the first year of the pandemic) Next year’s LPR graph is going to fall off of a cliff. Just using the official (fake) data, this is just catastrophic for men. It’s pretty good for women (officially).
Okay now consider that if the economy stayed flat the Red line should go up at the same rate that the Blue line goes down. But the Red line goes up faster, showing that we had a lot less housewives and a bit more workers. It used to be possible to have a family with one income, now it requires two (by design).
But what happened in 2000? The Red line stopped going up and the Blue line just maintained its death march down. If that’s true, the economy has been collapsing since 2000. Why isn’t that reflected in any of the data? It wasn’t the fault of immigrants. I used to be fairly high up in the USA Census Department, and trust me we even count immigrants. They are included in this “data”. The state governments get paid for immigrants, so every state tries very hard to count them.
Okay, I can’t hold back my excitement, so I’m just going to tell you what the deal is. See how that blue line is almost straight, for 70+ years? That’s accurate. You see how the red line has this odd kink in it? That’s fake. If anything, the Red line starts to go up exponentially. That’s why women spend as much as men (I did all this math in my Gender Wars paper) despite claiming they earn less and work less than men. Women also have higher rates of home ownership.
Today that Red Line is MUCH higher than the Blue line. So this begs a number of questions, all of which I will answer here:
Who would benefit from faking the LPR?
How would they fake something so huge?
Government AND academia would have to be complicit. Why?
If correct, the USA economy added a LOT of jobs. How?
I provided a partial answer in my paper on the emerging Sexual Supermarket. There I explain the global sex work economy and estimated the number of sex workers globally at between 300 and 500 million. Almost 10% of those are in the USA even though the USA only has about 4% of the global population. Sex work is a luxury good, and the stronger an economy (and the larger the Master class), the more luxuries you can afford. Most of those jobs were added in the last 15 years with the introduction of sugar dating and “streaming” services that support SW. That’s when that Red line really started to climb, and that’s when women started to pass men in earning power.
So who would benefit from covering that up? Anyone doing SW, and the Masters buying SW. Most of them do, even if they look so shrivelled up that they seem barely able to walk. The whole Epstein thing and coverup showed how intensely leadership wants to make sure this whole situation doesn’t exist for the public. The reason we have data to support it is because sugar dating sites and streaming services benefit from bragging about their number of “content creators” and their “traffic volume”.
Why would they want to fake the LPR? Well, a lot of economists are pretty sheltered and don’t know what’s going on out there. But the ones that do, really don’t want to lose their jobs by adjusting the Red line. The sugar dating sites don’t technically take a cut of “transactions”, they just take subscription fees. This makes “traffic volume” invisible on their sites. Thus their popularity. Of course I’ve surveyed thousands of participants so this is less invisible to me. As I pointed out previously, I surveyed over 150,000 people (mostly women) during the 10 years I did research on dating apps to extend my domain expertise to that part of interactive media.
What does monitor “traffic volume” is OnlyFans. They take the money from “clients/fans” , take their cut, then pay the “content creators”. The clients here are Freemen, the Masters can afford the real stuff. So OF is forced to record and transmit tax data…. Yes really! The Masters only use OF to recruit top talent into the black market where it disappears from view. That’s not recorded anywhere except the occasional SW with loose lips. Or, the most stupid of Masters when they run around bragging about how they Venmo their SWs.
Normally the more intelligent SWs, the ones that do in-person SW especially, get paid in cash. This means they can hide their income and work entirely. This benefits their “clients” also who would like this activity to stay hidden. Since academic economics are happy to trust whatever numbers are handed to them by the government (which is just PACKED with people using SWs), they will publish and work with these numbers even if they somehow doubt them. Ever wonder how these old men in the USA government seem able to contort themselves better than Olympic gymnasts when you ask them about SW? Hopefully I’m not stealing your innocence here.
So yes the economy has been adding a lot of jobs, 90% of those for women. The other 10% becomes easy to monitor every time a bunch of our Masters have a convention and Grindr crashes from all the traffic. I can’t help but laugh at all of this since I have close SW friends who have had congressmen as clients. Please note that I’m asexual, and never a client, so these people have no problem spilling their guts to me.
The Demographics of AI Displacement
My readership is well aware that AI is here to displace us in the Labor pool, and even in our relationships. Heck, even my readers are being replaced by AI! But who will be the most affected?
These are the top 10 fields of work for men, and I’ve circled the ones I think are most resistant to AI replacement:
And for women:
Intuitively you would expect manual labor jobs to be most resistant to AI replacement, and you might think men do more physical labor. Even if per man they do, from what I’m seeing here it seems like there are at least as many women doing AI resistant work, especially if you included children-facing jobs. From my own experience in nursing school, it can be very hard for men to get through these programs, especially if they are seen as “attractive”. Harassment is normalized. I’m sure this is very similar to the experience that women have trying to break into male dominated career paths.
While it may be hard to call if AI will hurt one gender more than others, this isn’t looking good for men. Most of these “resistant” jobs are relatively low paying. This will just continue to put pressure on people to do “Master-facing” work, particularly SW.
Violence Against Women
There has been a lot of women claiming on social media that they would feel safer with a bear than with a man. These sentiments can be easily discounted as misandry and male bashing. Or as part of algorithm-promoted demoralization campaigns. But as I watch this mass migration to SW (which I find fascinating) I began to wonder about something.
Homicide rates in the USA are at their lowest rates in decades, suggesting this is indeed algorithm promoted hysteria. Domestic violence is increasingly initiated by women (due to low odds of consequences) but outcomes are still worse for women since they are picking fights with much larger mammals. This still doesn’t match the concern though.
The rate of violence against in-person SWs is bleak. The rates of homicide against cis female SWs is only eclipsed by the rates that transwomen experience. Now that got me wondering… What if the violence against SWs is under reported for the same reasons that their income is under or non reported? Police don’t put a lot of effort into investigating cases involving SWs or druggies (or both).
So why would women report this huge spike in fear of violence from men while the statistics say that isn’t real? What if it was real but was being masked for the same reasons and using the same methods as the LPR? My concern is that this trend might be real but obfuscated, and that it will just become worse over time. I also worry that “Master on Freeman/Slave” violence (which has been going on for thousands of years) is going to be blamed on male Freemen. These sorts of crimes are extremely difficult to investigate and prosecute due to fear of retaliation and collusion with law enforcement. The Epstein case is just one data point out of millions.
Final Thoughts
I’m not at all happy with how this is trending for men or women. The common theme here is that Freemen are pretty screwed in the coming economy. Poor behavior on the part of our Masters will increasingly be blamed on immigrants, men, women, and transfolk. Simultaneously, the world is going to become a more dangerous place for all genders of Freemen.
I realize that I’m not giving you a lot of advice on how to make things better here. At the least, I hope that my readers will become more resistant to misinformation and have compassion on their fellow Freemen, regardless of their gender and will not look down on SW. People do what they need to to survive.
And women: Bashing men isn’t helping you or them. They’ve been sacrificing for your prosperity since at least 1950. They haven’t asked for much in return other than respect. Men still want to protect and provide, it’s their nature. But they are increasingly learning to turn that off and harden themselves when they get disrespected. Your social media is intensely directing you to engage in this disrespect, but maybe take a moment to consider where that programming might be coming from.
And of course the more difficult it is for men to find work, the less ability they will have to give money to women in any sort of transactional relationships (traditional or SW). Blaming them is not the solution. Conversely, if someone pulls up in a Ferrari and offers you $1000 to sacrifice your emotional health, I won’t judge you. But realize that person is part of the problem, and part of the reason the guy you’d rather be with is unemployed.